Four hundred and you may eighty-about three players was in fact employed away from a giant college or university in the Hong-kong due to adverts printed in campus and places, bulk characters because of divisions and you can qualities, and you will snowballing. Review taken place inside the a laboratory. Participants done the newest sex salience scale, this new blended-sex anxiety scale and you can stated their group records. All methods were presented within brand-new English language because the English ‘s the typical off classes to own tertiary knowledge into the Hong-kong. This research is done in conformity towards the information and recognition of College out-of Hong kong People Lookup Integrity Panel (HKU HREC). Most of the victims provided composed advised agree in accordance with the Statement away from Helsinki. Parental concur was not necessary for brand new HKU HREC for it shot.
School banding was averaged if participants had attended more than one high school (only 4.1% of the total sample). Participants also reported their college year, total parental income and parental education, numbers of sisters and brothers, faculty, and sexual orientation. Students’ faculty was coded as male-dominated, female-dominated, or gender-balanced based on enrolment statistics . Sexual orientation was assessed their explanation using the adapted Klein Sexual Orientation Grid (KSOG) . Participants rated their sexual orientation in the past 12 months on four aspects, namely attraction, behavior, fantasy, and identity, from 0 (other-sex only) to 6 (same-sex only). The number of participants was roughly balanced by school type and student gender. Participants who had switched between single-sex and coeducational schools were excluded from analysis (n = 27). The final sample consisted of 456 graduates (239 females; 52.4%) who had attended 182 different high schools. These graduates either attended single-sex schools (n = 207) or coeducational schools (n = 249) for high school education. This sample size had over 80% a priori power to detect small differences (.26 < d < .30) at ? = .05, two-tailed . The sample was almost exclusively Chinese (97.6%) and aged years on average. The mean parental income of the sample (HKD42632) suggested that the sample was demographically similar to undergraduate students from several local universities (e.g., [58–60]).
Desk 6 presents detailed participant characteristics by school type and student gender. Consistent with prior research [3,4,8], participants from single-sex schools had parents with higher education level, t(454) = 3.48, p = .001, and attended more academically excellent schools, t(387) = 4.26, p < .001, unequal variances, than did participants from coeducational schools.
b step 1 = no schooling/pre-no. 1, dos = number one, 3 = junior supplementary, 4 = older supplementary, 5 = post-second, 6 = postgraduate.
c 0 = almost every other sex only, 1 = most other gender mainly, 2 = almost every other gender considerably more, step three = both gender just as, cuatro = exact same intercourse considerably more, 5 = exact same sex mainly, six = exact same intercourse just.
d Details inside desk were provided once the covariates in every analyses, except for standard public stress which was integrated once the a covariate merely during the analyses connected with combined-gender nervousness into the university try.
Intercourse salience level
Intercourse salience was counted of the exact same approach used in Research 1. The latest inter-rater precision try ideal for all of the solutions (? anywhere between .87 in order to .99).
Portion of other-intercourse best friends measure
Part of almost every other-gender close friends was counted by the same strategy utilized in Study 1. Percentage of almost every other-gender family members wasn’t reviewed on the school try.
Mixed-intercourse stress level
Like in Studies 1, members advertised the blended-sex stress with the changed relationship anxiety size (DAS-A) . Compared with Studies 1, people when you look at the Investigation dos done a full 21-items brand of DAS-An in this dating sense are well-known in the school try (93.4% of the players claimed a global relationship sense; select range of relationship feel factors regarding the Dating Record Survey during the Table D into the S1 Document). People that got never ever old just before had been expected to imagine exactly how they will end up being and you can work about described circumstances. For this full scale, ten products mentioned Fear of Negative Review, eight circumstances measured Personal Distress during the Relationship Factors, four facts measured Public Worry within the Combined-gender Teams, and you may five filler affairs considering some slack out of rating stress-relevant things. The interior texture is best for complete DAS-An effective (? = .95), Concern about Bad Testing (? = .92), Public Distress in the Relationship (? = .89), and you may Personal Stress from inside the Mixed-intercourse Groups (? = .80). Because the attract wasn’t just on matchmaking stress and simply 2.6% of university professionals stated having no heterosexual interest whatsoever, we provided most of the players on the data of blended-intercourse nervousness and you can controlled for sexual orientation.